![is soredex digora optime made in finland is soredex digora optime made in finland](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_k04FWYAEwW7M.jpg)
Racy of F-speed film and storage phosphor plate (SPP)amel subsurface demineralization.exposed to a demineralizing solution. T only a few studies have tested the effect of differentposure times on the quality of SPP images.2-5 More-er, most of the studies compared the diagnostic ac-racy of white SPPs belonging to the older version ofgora (fmx) with that of E- or Ekta-speed films.2-4,6ere is only 1 study that compared the subjectiveage quality of the F-speed films and white SPPsing various exposure times considering the structuresĥ8e storage phosphor plates for: effect of different exposureĪn Sen, DDS, PhD,b and Ali Mert, DDS, PhDc Was previously proved that exposure time is the mosttical factor influencing diagnostic image quality.1 Therature is replete with studies comparing the accuracy ofrage phosphor plate (SPP) systems and conventionals for caries detection. Diagnostic accuracy of films and SPPs was not imwever, diagnosis was impaired when reduced 52%.
![is soredex digora optime made in finland is soredex digora optime made in finland](https://img.medicalexpo.com/pdf/repository_me/102764/digora-optime-product-195264_4m.jpg)
Azs of films were higher than the SPPs exposeds found between the Azs of the 2 systems when SPPs were enclusions. Significant differences were obtained among Azs of 0.0Ps (P.
IS SOREDEX DIGORA OPTIME MADE IN FINLAND WINDOWS
Standard enamel windows of extracted premolaiographed before and after acid application with F-speed filre exposed using 4 exposure times. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostiposed with different exposure times for the detection of artifidy Design. Gniz Baks, DDS, PhD,a Be University, Izmir, Turkey To minimizethe risks to radiation workers and to patients, opti-mal (as low as reasonably practicable) exposureconditions for each x-ray receptor should be deter-mined for each diagnostic task.iagnostic accuracy of Digora Oproximal subsurface demineralizamesin nem, DDS, PhD,a B. Incorrect exposures can necessitate retakes, expos-ing the patient to additional radiation. Partment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Den-ry.epartment of Endodontology, School of Dentistry.partment of Statistics, Faculty of Science.Ĭeived for publication return for revision Mar 9,2 accepted for publication May 28, 2012.Ģ012 Elsevier Inc. The evaluation of exposure time for blue Digora Optimeplates for proximal caries diagnosis used 10%-25% ofthe exposure time needed for that of Ekta-Plus film.3However, we could find no study testing various levelsof exposure time reductions with the use of blue DigoraOptime plates and F-speed film for detection of inter-proximal subsurface demineralization. The only study includingĮ7t again, the effect of different exposure times was notted.The greatest difficulty in caries detection involvesrly demineralization, which is confined only to theamel.8,9 The capacity of several radiographic meth-s for detection of different degrees of enamel demin-lization was investigated in many studies.8,10-12 In So far, the effect of exposure time oncaries diagnosis with the use of blue Digora SPPs hasnot been studied adequately. In anotherstudy, Pontual et al.7 compared F-speed (Insight) filmwith the blue SPPs of the new version of the Digorasystem (Optime) regarding proximal caries detection butesĬlinical tasks. Ob c accuex cial enStu rs wererad ms anwe acterisRe 8- verSP withwa xposeCo pairedho rg Or